"The Watchmen - A Review" Review

I am sure most of you have seen Revek's review of The Watchmen. I will review that review.

Structure and flow
The review was well paced and had sufficient explanation of each element. The Introduction was rather long and suffered from spoilers, but he did warn us at the beginning of the review.
Critique elements
Revek's review of the film was introduced as positive, but immediately degenerated in "nit picks". This approaches hypocrisy somewhat, and discredits him as a bona-fide reviewer.
Original content
On this point, Revek performs. Very few times have HoC members taken to their keyboards to present solid content. Even fewer have created content that originated from their own thoughts. Most simply cut&paste refurbished verbiage from indecent and dubious rags. Not Revek. He carried the flag proudly, and proved, once and for all, that he would rather spend 2 hours in front of his computer entertaining us than take that same time going outside for a walk.
Spelling
Well, it's Revek. But I am sure that most noticed that his browser is now equipped with a spell checker, thereby bringing his usual typographical explosions to a much lower occurrence. He would do well to remember that a spell checker doesn't fix bad sentence construction.
Use of The Paws
Apparently, his review Paws are cumulative...
1+2+2=4

Overall, I rate his review 3 Paws